Page 195 - Gesundheitliche-Auswirkungen-5G
P. 195

STOA | Panel for the Future of Science and Technology
 Divan HA, Kheifets L, Olsen J. Prenatal cell phone use and developmental milestone delays among infants. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environmental Health. 2011; 37: 341–348.
Fejes I, Závaczki Z, Szöllősi J, et al. Is there a relationship between cell phone use and semen quality? Archives of Andrology. 2005; 51: 385-393.
Guxens M, van Eijsden M, Vermeulen R, et al. Maternal cell phone and cordless phone use during pregnancy and behaviour problems in 5-year-old children. Journal epidemiology community health. 2013; 67: 432-8.
Jurewicz J, Radwan M, Sobala W, et al. Lifestyle and semen quality: role of modifiable risk factors. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine. 2014; 60: 43-51
Lewis RC, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Meeker JD, et al. Self-reported mobile phone use and semen parameters among men from a fertility clinic. Reproductive toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.). 2017; 67, 42-47.
Lu X, Oda M, Ohba T, et al. Association of excessive mobile phone use during pregnancy with birth weight: an adjunct study in Kumamoto of Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. 2017; 22:52.
Mahmoudabadi F, Ziaei S, Firoozabadi M and Kazemnejad A.Use of mobile phone during pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion. J Environmental Health Science Engineering. 2015; 13:34.
Mjøen G, Saetre DO, Lie RT, et al. Paternal occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. European journal of epidemiology. 2006; 21: 529-35.
Møllerløkken OJ, Moen BE. Is fertility reduced among men exposed to radiofrequency fields in the Norwegian Navy? Bioelectromagnetics. 2008; 29: 345-52.
Papadopoulou E, Haugen M, Schjølberg S, et al. Maternal cell phone use in early pregnancy and child’s language, communication and motor skills at 3 and 5 years: the Norwegian mother and child cohort study (MoBa). BMC Public Health. 2017; 17:685
Radwan M, Jurewicz J, Merecz-Kot D, et al. Sperm DNA damage-the effect of stress and everyday life Factors. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2016;28: 148–154.
Shi X, Pui Shan Chan C, Waters T, et al. Lifestyle and demographic factors associated with human semen quality and sperm function. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine. 2018; 64: 358-367.
Sudan M, Birks LE, Aurrekoetxea JJ,et al. Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy and child cognition at age 5 years in 3 birth cohorts. Environment International. 2018; 120, 155-62.
Tan TC, Neo GH, Malhotra R, et al. Lifestyle Risk Factors Associated with Threatened Miscarriage: A Case- Control Study. Journal of Fertilization: In vitro - IVF-Worldwide, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics and Stem Cell Biology. 2014; 2: 123.
Tsarna E, Reedijk M, Birks LE, et al. Associations of Maternal Cell-Phone Use During Pregnancy With Pregnancy Duration and Fetal Growth in 4 Birth Cohorts. American journal of epidemiology. 2019; 188: 1270-1280.
Yildirim M, Kaynar M, Badem H, et al. What is harmful for male fertility: Cell phone or the wireless internet? Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015; 31, 480-484.
Zarei S, Mortazavi SM, Mehdizadeh AR, et al. A Challenging Issue in the Etiology of Speech Problems: The Effect of Maternal Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields on Speech Problems in the Offspring. Journal of biomedical physics and engineering. 2015; 5: 151-4.
Zhang G, Yan H, Chen Q, et al. Effects of cell phone use on semen parameters: Results from the MARHCS cohort study in Chongqing, China, Environment International. 2016; 91, 116–121.
Zilberlicht A, Wiener-Megnazi Z, Sheinfeld Yet al. Habits of cell phone usage and sperm quality - does it warrant attention? Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2015; 31, 421–426.

   193   194   195   196   197