Page 194 - Gesundheitliche-Auswirkungen-5G

Szudzinski A, Pietraszek A, Janiak M, et al. Acceleration of the development of benzopyrene­ induced skin cancer in mice by microwave radiation. Arch Dermatol Res. 1982; 274: 303-312.
Tillmann T, Ernst H, Ebert S, et al. Carcinogenicity study of GSM and DCS wireless communication signals in B6C3F1 mice. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007; 28: 173-187.
Tillmann T, Ernst H, Streckert J, et al. Indication of cocarcinogenic potential of chronic UMTS­ modulated radiofrequency exposure in an ethylnitro­ sourea mouse model. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010; 86: 529-541.
Toler JC, Shelton WW, Frei MR, et al. Long-term, low-level exposure of mice prone to mammary tumours to 435 MHz radiofrequency radiation. Radiat Res. 1997; 148: 227-234.
Utteridge TD, Gebski V, Finnie JW, et al. Long­ term exposure of E-mu-Piml transgenic mice to 898.4 MHz microwaves does not increase lymphoma incidence. Radiat Res. 2002; 158: 357-364.
van Kreijl CF, van der Houven van Oordt CW, Kroese ED et al. Evaluation of the Emu-pim-1 transgenic mouse model for short-term carci­ nogenicity testing. Toxicol Pathol. 1998; 26: 750-756.
Wu RY, Chiang H, Shao BJ, et al. Effects of 2.45-GHz microwave radiation and phorbol ester 12-O- tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate on dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer in mice. Bioelectromagnetics. 1994; 15: 531-538.
Yu D, Shen Y, Kuster N, et al. Effects of 900 MHz GSM wireless communication signals on DMBA­ induced mammary tumours in rats. Radiat Res. 2006; 165: 174-180.
Zook BC, Simmens SJ The effects of 860 MHz radi ofrequency radiation on the induction or promotion of brain tumours and other neoplasms in rats. Radiat Res. 2001;155: 572-583.
Zook BC, Simmens SJ . Effects of a cell phone radio-frequency (860 MHz) on the latency of brain tumours in rats. Int Congr Ser. 2002; 1236: 137-139.
Zook BC, Simmens SJ. The effects of pulsed 860 MHz radiofrequency radiation on the promotion of neurogenic tumours in rats. Radiat Res. 2006; 165: 608-615.
8.4 References for the review on reproductive/developmental effects in humans
Abad M, Malekafzali H, Simbar M, et al. Association between electromagnetic field exposure and abortion in pregnant women living in Tehran. Iran J Reproductive Medicine. 2016;14: 347-354.
Al-Bayyari N. The effect of cell phone usage on semen quality and fertility among Jordanian males. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2017;22, 178–182.
Al-Quzwini O, Al-Taee H, Al-Shaikh S. Male fertility and its association with occupational and mobile phone towers hazards: An analytic study. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2016; 21: 236–240.
Baste V, Riise T, Moen BE. Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields; male infertility and sex ratio of offspring. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23:369-77.
Blay RM, Pinamang AD, Sagoe AE, et al. Influence of Lifestyle and Environmental Factors on Semen Quality in Ghanaian Men. Int J Reprod Med. 2020:6908458.
Boileau N, Margueritte F, Gauthier T, et al. Mobile phone use during pregnancy: Which association with fetal growth? J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 ;49:101852.
Choi KH, Ha M, Ha EH, et al. Neurodevelopment for the first three years following prenatal mobile phone use, radio frequency radiation and lead exposure. Environmental research. 2017; 156, 810-817.
Col-Araz N. Evaluation of factors affecting birth weight and preterm birth in southern Turkey. J Pakistan Medical Association. 2013; 63: 459-462.
Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, Olsen J. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.). 2008; 19: 523-9.
Health impact of 5G
171