Page 182 - Gesundheitliche-Auswirkungen-5G

Morgan R L, Whaley P, Thayer K A, Schünemann HJ. Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes. Environmental International, 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327267890
Moskowitz, Joel M. Effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields. Electromagnetic Radiation Safety, 2018 (updated 2020). 2020. https://publichealth.berkeley.edu/news-media/video-room/joel-m- moskowitz-radio-frequency-radiation-health-risks-implications-for-5g/
Nasim I, Kim S. Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink. 2017. arXiv:1711.03683v1 [eess.SP].
Neufeld E and Kuster N.Response to Professor Foster’s Comments. Health Physics. 2019; 117,1: 70-71
https://journals.lww.com/health- physics/Citation/2019/07000/Response_to_Professor_Foster_s_Comments.10.aspx
NTP, National Toxicology Program. Peer review of the draft NTP technical reports on cell phone radiofrequency radiation. 2018. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/about_ntp/trpanel/2018/march/peerreview20180328_508.pdf
OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Test No. 421: Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. 2018; OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264264380-en.
OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Trust and Public Policy: How Better Governance Can Help Rebuild Public Trust. OECD Public Governance Reviews. 2017; OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268920-en.
OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Test No. 443: Extended One- Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. 2018a; OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264185371-en.
OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Test No. 451: Carcinogenicity Studies. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. 2018b; OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264071186-en.
OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study (EOGRTS) (OECD TG 443). Revised Guidance Document 150 on Standardised Test Guidelines for Evaluating Chemicals for Endocrine Disruption. 2018c. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304741-34-en.
Pakhomov AG, Akyel Y, Pakhomova ON, et al. Current state and implications of research on biological effects of millimeter waves: a review of the literature. Bioelectromagnetics. 1998; 19:393-413.
Peterson J, Pearce PF MPH, Ferguson LA, Langford CA . Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/2327-6924.12380
Philips A, Henshaw DL, Lamburn G, O'Carroll MJ. Brain tumours: rise in glioblastoma multiforme incidence in England 1995-2015 suggests an adverse environmental or lifestyle factor. J Environ Public Health. 2018; Article ID 7910754, 10 pages.https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7910754Qualcom.com. Global update on spectrum for 4G and 5G. 2020. https://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/spectrum-for-4g-and-5g.pdf
Ramundo-Orlando A. Effects of millimeter waves radiation on cell membrane - A brief review. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves. 2010; 31:1400–1411.
Rappaport T, Sun S, Mayzus S, et al. Millimeter wave mobile communications for 5G cellular: it will work! IEEE Access. 2013; 1: 335-349.
Romanenko S, Harvey AR, Hool L, et al. Millimeter wave radiation activates leech nociceptors via TRPV1- Like receptor sensitization. Biophys J. 2019; 116:2331–2345.
Röösli M, Lagorio S, Schoemaker MJ, et al. Brain and salivary gland tumours and mobile phone use: evaluating the evidence from various epidemiological study designs. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019; 40: 221–38.
Health impact of 5G
159