Page 181 - Gesundheitliche-Auswirkungen-5G

STOA | Panel for the Future of Science and Technology
IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs during 2020–2024. IARC. 2019. https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp- content/uploads/2019/10/IARCMonographs-AGReport-Priorities_2020-2024.pdf.
ICNIRP. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 KHZ TO 300 GHz). Health Phys. 2020a; 118: 483–524. https://www.icnirp.org/en/activities/news/news-article/rf-guidelines-2020- published.html
ICNIRP. Differences between the ICNIRP (2020) and previous guidelines. 2020b. https://www.icnirp.org/en/differences.html
ICNIRP. Public consultation. 2020c. https://www.icnirp.org/en/activities/public- consultation/index.html
IEEE Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to the radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, IEEE Standard C95.1. 1992.
IEEE Standard Letter Designations for Radar-Frequency Bands, In: IEEE Std 521-2002 (Revision of IEEE Std 521-1984). 2003;1-10.
IEEE Standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to the radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, IEEE Standard C95.1. 2005.
ISTISAN, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, report 19/11. Lagorio S, Anglesio L, d’Amore G, Marino C, Scarfì MR. RFy radiation and cancer: summary of the scientific evidence. 2019; ii, 111 (in Italian).
Lebedeva NN Sensor and subsensor reactions of a healthy man to peripheral effects of low-intensity millimeter waves. Mil-limetrovie Volni v Biologii i Medicine. 1993; 2: 5–23 (in Russian).
Lebedeva NN. Neurophysiological mechanisms of biological effects of peripheral action of low- intensity nonionizing electro-magnetic fields in humans. 10th Russian symposium Millimeter Waves in Medicine and Biology. 1995; 138–140. (Digest of papers). Moscow: IRE RAN. (in Russian).
Le Drean Y, Mahamoud YS, Le Page Y, et al. State of knowledge on biological effects at 40–60 GHz. Comptes Rendus Physique. 2013; 14:402-411.
Leszczynski D. 2020. https://betweenrockandhardplace.wordpress.com/2020/03/31/fact-check-there- are-no-30-000-studies-on-health-effects-of-emf-used-in-wireless-communication/
Madjar HM. Human radio frequency exposure limits: An update of reference levels in Europe, USA, Canada, China, Japan and Korea. 2016 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility- EMC EUROPE. IEEE, 2016.
Mandrioli D, Schlünssen V, Ádám B, et al. WHO/ILO work-related burden of disease and injury: Protocol for systematic reviews of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres and of the effect of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres on pneumoconiosis. Environment International. 2018; 119 :174-185.
Maronpot RR, Flake G, Huff J. Relevance of animal carcinogenesis findings to human cancer predictions and prevention. Toxicologic Pathology. 2004; 32; 40-48.
Melnick R. Regarding ICNIRP’S Evaluation of the National Toxicology Program’s Carcinogenicity Studies on Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. Health Physics. 2020; 118: 6.
Microwave News (2020). 5G Waveforms in Dispute. Ken Foster and Niels Kuster Disagree on Averaging Times. https://www.microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/5g-waveforms-dispute
Mitschke F. Fiber-Optic Sensors. In: Fiber Optics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03703-0_12.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, for the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
Montano L, Bergamo P, Andreassi MG, Lorenzetti S. The Role of Human Semen as an Early and Reliable Tool of Environmental Impact Assessment on Human Health. Eco Food Fertility group. 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73231
158