Page 55 - Wirkung-von-nichtionisierender-Strahlung-NIS-auf-Arthropoden

[130] [131]
[132] [133]
[134] [135]
[136] [137] [138]
[139] [140]
[141]
[142]
J.C.Habel,A.Segerer,W.Ulrich,O.Torchyk,W.W.Weisser,etT.Schmitt,«Butterfly community shifts over two centuries: Shifts in Butterfly Communities », Conserv. Biol., vol. 30, no 4, p. 754‐762, août 2016, doi: 10.1111/cobi.12656.
D. E. Bowler, H. Heldbjerg, A. D. Fox, M. Jong, et K. Böhning‐Gaese, « Long‐term declines of European insectivorous bird populations and potential causes », Conserv. Biol., vol. 33, no 5, p. 1120‐1130, oct. 2019, doi: 10.1111/cobi.13307. J.Kampetal.,«PopulationtrendsofcommonbreedingbirdsinGermany1990–2018», J. Ornithol., vol. 162, no 1, p. 1‐15, janv. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10336-020-01830-4.
Z. Benedek, F. Jordán, et A. Báldi, « Topological keystone species complexes in ecological interaction networks », Community Ecol., vol. 8, no 1, p. 1‐7, déc. 2007, doi: 10.1556/ComEc.8.2007.1.1.
V. I. Makarov et I. Khmelinskii, « External control of {theDrosophila} melanogasteregg to imago development period by specific combinations of 3D low-frequency electric and magnetic fields », Electromagn. Biol. Med., vol. 35, no 1, p. 15--29, 2014.
V. P. Bindokas, J. R. Gauger, et B. Greenberg, « Mechanism of biological effects observed in honey bees (apis mellifera, L.) hived under extra-high-voltage transmission lines: Implications derived from bee exposure to simulated intense electric fields and shocks », Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 9, no 3, p. 285--301, 1988.
D. J. Panagopoulos, A. Karabarbounis, et C. Lioliousis, « ELF Alternating Magnetic Field Decreases Reproduction by DNA Damage Induction », Cell Biochem. Biophys., vol. 67, no 2, p. 703‐716, mars 2013, doi: 10.1007/s12013-013-9560-5.
T. Kikuchi, M. Ogawa, Y. Otaka, et M. Furuta, « Multigeneration exposure test of Drosophila melanogaster to ELF magnetic fields », Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 19, no 6, p. 335‐340, 1998, doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-186x(1998)19:6<335::aid-bem1>3.0.co;2-2. K.-S.Chae,«Anextremelylowfrequencymagneticfieldincreasesunconditionedlarval movement of the common cutworm,Spodoptera litura: A novel model for a magnetoreceptive neurobehavioral study », Entomol. Res., vol. 38, no 4, p. 299‐302, déc. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5967.2008.00190.x.
D. Todorovi􏰀 et al., « The impact of chronic exposure to a magnetic field on energy metabolism and locomotion of Blaptica dubia », Int. J. Radiat. Biol., vol. 96, no 8, p. 1076‐1083, août 2020, doi: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1770360. M.Stamenkovi􏰀-Radak,I.Kitanovi􏰀,Z.Proli􏰀,I.Tomisi􏰀,B.Stojkovi􏰀,etM.Andjelkovic, « Effect of a permanent magnetic field on wing size parameters in Drosophila melanogaster », Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 22, no 5, p. 365‐369, juill. 2001, doi: 10.1002/bem.63.
J. H. Graham, D. Fletcher, J. Tigue, et M. McDonald, « Growth and developmental stability {ofDrosophila} melanogaster in low frequency magnetic fields», Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 21, no 6, p. 465--472, 2000.
T.-H. Ma et K.-C. Chu, « Effect of the extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic field (EMF) on developing embryos of the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster L.) », Mutat. Res. Lett., vol. 303, no 1, p. 35‐39, sept. 1993, doi: 10.1016/0165-7992(93)90006-H.
[143] G. Becker, « Reaction of termites to weak alternating magnetic fields »,
Naturwissenschaften, vol. 63, no 4, p. 201--202, 1976.
S. Geronikolou, S. Zimeras, C. H. Davos, I. Michalopoulos, et S. Tsitomeneas, « Diverse Radiofrequency Sensitivity and Radiofrequency Effects of Mobile or Cordless Phone near Fields Exposure in Drosophila melanogaster », PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no 11, p. e112139, nov. 2014, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112139.
L. H. Margaritis et al., « Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources », Electromagn. Biol. Med., vol. 33, no 3, p. 165‐189, sept. 2014, doi: 10.3109/15368378.2013.800102.
D. J. Panagopoulos et L. H. Margaritis, « The effect of exposure duration on the biological activity of mobile telephony radiation», Mutat. Res. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen., vol. 699, no 1‐2, p. 17‐22, juin 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.04.010.
52
[144]
[145] [146]